Page 6 of 10
|Wednesday, 24 July 2013|
The proposed CTP roundtable was held on 24 July 2013, to discuss proposed reforms to the CTP greenslip scheme in NSW.
In his welcome, Minister for Ageing and Disability Services, Andrew Constance said that he wants the government's position on the reforms resolved by the end of August.
Chair for the day, Paul McClintock will prepare a report on the discussions for the Minister and the steering committee. The report will be published.
In his summing up, Mr McClintock identified the following issues and observations from the day:
We will provide information on the report as soon as it is available.Add a comment
|Wednesday, 03 July 2013|
On 19 June 2013, the NSW Government announced that proposed reforms to the NSW CTP greenslip scheme would be delayed. The government admitted that it would not get the reforms through the upper house and that wider community consultation was required.
At the time of the announcement, Acting Minister for Finance and Services, Andrew Constance said that the Government wanted to consult further with stakeholders and that it would do so by facilitating a CTP roundtable.
Mr Constance has announced that the roundtable to discuss reforms to the CTP greenslip scheme will be held at Parliament House on Wednesday 24 July 2013.
Paul McClintock AO, Chairman of Myer Holdings Limited and former Secretary to Cabinet in the Australian Government has been appointed to chair the roundtable. ABC broadcaster Peter Thompson will act as facilitator and John Walsh AM, former Associate Commissioner at the Productivity Commission will provide actuarial expertise at the roundtable.
Invitations are being issued to insurers, lawyers, motoring groups, accident victims and community and business leaders.
An issues paper will be released a week prior to the roundtable.
Members of the public will be entitled to sit in on proceedings.
Mr Constance said that “the NSW Government has listened to community concerns and will use the roundtable to explain the reforms more effectively and explore the concerns of the various representatives.”
Add a comment
|Thursday, 20 June 2013|
The NSW Government announced yesterday that proposed reforms to the NSW CTP greenslip scheme will be delayed. The Government will need to re-visit the nature and the extent of the reforms in order to get them through parliament and to gain wider community acceptance for them.
In his press release, Acting Minister for Finance and Services Andrew Constance said that “the NSW Government does not have the numbers in the Legislative Council to proceed with the legislation and believes more work is necessary to discuss the reform with the community”.
The Government has been criticised for the reforms and for the speed at which they are being pushed through.
The Government is proposing to move to a no-fault scheme. Under the scheme, for most injured parties benefits are prescribed and cut off after five years. Because benefits are capped and because the scheme is not fault based, the government argues that the cost of the scheme, including benefits paid, administrative and legal costs will be reduced, resulting in lower premiums. Opponents argue that injured parties will not be adequately compensated and a mandatory cut off period is unreasonable. Opponents are also concerned that most injured parties will no longer have the benefit of legal advice and representation.
The initial consultation period was relatively short. The initial discussion paper was released on 17 February 2013, with public comment open until 5 April 2013. The Bill was introduced into the lower house approximately five weeks later on 9 May 2013.
The Government says it wants to consult further with stakeholders.
“We will take the next six weeks to communicate and further consult on stakeholder issues and at the same time work with cross bench MPs”.
“We will facilitate further discussion by holding a CTP roundtable involving relevant players including accident victims, insurers, lawyers, community and business leaders”.
“The bill will be further consulted on as part of this process and a position paper will be released prior to the roundtable”.
The CTP roundtable is expected to be held in mid July. The Government expects the bill to be discussed in the upper house in late August.Add a comment
|Friday, 17 May 2013|
In March we published an overview of the proposed reforms to the CTP green slip scheme in NSW.
The reforms were open for a period of public comment and consultation, ending 5 April 2013.
Copies of some submissions are included on the MAA website, including those from Actuaries Institute NSW, Insurance Council of Australia, NSW Motorcycle Alliance, Transport for NSW, QBE, NRMA and Joint Submission of NSW Bar Assoc; Law Society; Australian Lawyers Association.
The Motor Accident Injuries Amendment Bill 2013 was introduced into Parliament on 9 May 2013.
It is not clear, at this stage, when the Bill will be passed by Parliament or when the new legislation will commence, nor is there a timeline for implementation.
Regulations and Guidelines, which will cover implementation and operational aspects of the new scheme, have not been released. They are expected through the second half of this year.
Add a comment
|Tuesday, 12 March 2013|
There are many issues with the current NSW green slip scheme, particularly affecting affordability, efficiency and sustainability.
The NSW Government recognised that it needed to deal with those issues and instructed the Motor Accidents Authority (MAA) to develop a compulsory third party (CTP) pricing strategy.
The MAA responded with a plan for major reform of the scheme. The plan is set out in the document, "Reforms to the NSW Compulsory Third Party Green Slip Insurance Scheme", dated February 2013.
The document sets out the principles for reform of the scheme. It does not provide detail on how the reforms will be implemented nor does it provide a timetable for implementation.
1. The Current Scheme.
The current scheme is primarily fault based, making it complex and adversarial. The scheme is characterised by disputes over liability, extent of fault, severity of injury and the amount of compensation. The disputes result in high legal, medical and administrative costs, court action and delayed compensation.
Premiums are high, particularly relative to other states and affordability is decreasing.
Scheme inefficiencies, increasing claims frequency and uncertainty, the delay in settling claims and poor investment returns makes setting premiums difficult. Allowances for risk and future uncertainty often result in higher profits for insurers than is anticipated when premiums are set and submitted to the MAA. Flexibility to differentiate different risk groups on the basis of price is limited.
Without reform, it is likely that premiums will continue to increase. Pressure on premiums was the driver for the review and is a major focus for the reforms.
2. The Reformed Scheme.
The proposed reforms will change the fundamental nature of the scheme.
The new scheme will not be fault based. Injured parties will be entitled to defined benefits, regardless of fault. Common law will still be available to injured parties with greater than 10% whole person impairment and for those with catastrophic injuries the Lifetime Care & Support Scheme will not be affected.
The theory is that by removing the fault based nature of the scheme, disputes over liability and fault will be greatly reduced. Compensation will be prescribed and capped, again reducing the number and cost of disputes. The claims process should be simpler and claims should be paid much earlier. Dispute resolution mechanisms, a Code of Conduct for insurers and lawyers and safeguards for claimants will be implemented to further aid the process. Again, the theory is that pressure on premiums should decrease if expenses are lower and the risk and uncertainty factored into premiums by insurers is reduced.
In support of the theory, the MAA cites the experience in other states as showing that no fault schemes are more efficient and effective.
More people will be entitled to compensation under a no fault scheme. It is also likely that more injured people who are entitled to claim but do not bother, or give up, will pursue their claims.
Premium regulation and increased competition between the insurers is also part of the reform plan.
The MAA will be seeking to increase its powers in the regulation of premiums, but says it will offer simplification and more flexibility in the setting of premiums. It will also look to streamline the purchase process.
The new scheme will change the claims process so that injured parties claim against their own insurer, rather than the insurer of another vehicle. This will allow insurers to differentiate green slips on the basis of service, in addition to price.
Some downsides have been identified.
Because the scheme is no longer fault based, more people will be entitled to claim.
If compensation is capped, it is likely that the capped level will not fully compensate some injured parties. When compensation is capped at inadequate levels, injured parties may be forced to rely on other personal insurance policies.
3. What is Next?
The plan is open for public comment until 5 April 2013.
Consultation with stakeholders is underway.
A timetable for implementation is to be determined.
We will provide updates and commentary as the detail of the reform unfolds.Add a comment
Page 6 of 10